<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Socha Consulting LLC &#187; Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/category/rules/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com</link>
	<description>informing digital discovery decisions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Introduced to Enact Evidence Rule 502: 12/11/07</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2444</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2444#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/2444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Link to news posted on U.S. Courts Federal Rulemaking website:</p>
<p>On December 11, 2007, Senator Patrick Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced S. 2450, a bill adding new Evidence Rule 502 to the Federal Rules of Evidence. The legislation addresses waiver of the attorney-client privilege and work product protection and is identical to proposed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2444/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Rose by Any Other Name is Not a Rose:  The New F.R.C.P. Amendments</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2442</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2442#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog entries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/2442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Link to blog entry posted by Sharon Nelson on Ride the Lightning, December 19, 2007:</p>
<p>Effective on December 1, 2007, the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are often referred to as â€œthe style rulesâ€ and some lawyers have complacently chosen not to take a close look at them. This way lies a minefield however â€“ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2442/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One year after FRCP, struggles continue with e-discovery</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2424</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2424#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/2424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Link to news article by Beth Pariseau posted on SearchStorage.com, December 19, 2007:</p>
<p>A year ago, changes to the rules which federal courts use to prosecute civil cases went into effect. Those changes have since resulted in a wave of marketing hype from technology vendors, but only dim awareness among data managers about how the amendments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2424/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CommVault Survey Highlights Disconnect Between Legal and Information Technology Departments Over FRCP Ammendments</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2363</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2363#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/2363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Link to press release:  One Year Later, IT Departments Still Struggling to Address FRCP Requirements</p>
<p>OCEANPORT, N.J. â€” December 11, 2007 â€” It&#8217;s been one year since the US government overhauled the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) on December 1, 2006 in an effort to streamline the electronic discovery of information. A new study [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2363/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicken Little-gation In the Electronic World</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2343</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2343#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/2343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Link to article by Stephen Whetstone and Michael Simon posted on IndustryWeek, December 7, 2007:</p>
<p>A year ago, the rules that govern litigation in our federal courts were amended to require lawyers and clients to deal head on with electronically stored information (ESI). On December 1, 2006, changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2343/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discovery Rules Raise More Questions Than Answers</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2225</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2225#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alliances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/2225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Article by Lloyd B. Chinn posted on Law.com, November 7, 2007:</p>
<p>The shift toward electronic communications over the last 20 years has been well-documented; the courts have been wrestling with the challenges posed by electronic discovery ever since. Not until December 2006 did the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (&#8220;the new rules&#8221;) specifically address the unique [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2225/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perspective: The new e-discovery burden</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2118</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/2118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Article by Eric Sinrod posted on CNET News, October 17, 2007:</p>
<p>Almost a year ago the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing the discovery of electronic data were amended. While the changes were designed to reduce litigation costs, we&#8217;ve seen just the opposite.</p>
<p>The amendments broadened the definition of items subject to legal discovery, ranging from &#8220;documents&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2118/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Act Addresses Timely Issue of Electronic Discovery</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1814</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1814#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/1814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Press release: August 2, 2007 â€“ By some recent estimates, more than 90% of business information is now stored electronically.  The state rules concerning discovery of information in civil cases were written at a time when information was mostly stored on paper.  A new act approved today by a national law group addresses [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1814/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Turns in the Maze: Finding Your Way in the New Civil Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1749</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1749#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/1749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Article by Megan E. Burkhammer published in Bench &#038; Bar of Minnesota, Vol. 64, No. 5, May/June 2007:</p>
<p>Is Columbus Day a â€œlegal holidayâ€ for the purposes of computing time under Rule 6 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure? Can I get a subpoena from a Minnesota court to compel discovery in an action pending [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1749/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eighty-Three Percent of Technology Executives Say Their Companies Lack Comprehensive System to Preserve Data Needed in Lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1627</link>
		<comments>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1627#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Socha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/1627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Press release:Â  Six Months After Amended Federal Rules Changes Take Effect, Survey Shows Companies Not Prepared for E-Discovery</p>
<p>SAN FRANCISCO, CA May 29, 2007 â€“ Survey results announced today by DiscoveryBox and Strategic Discovery, Inc. reveal that 83 percent of technology decision makers are not prepared for litigation under the amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1627/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

