<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Socha Consulting LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sochaconsulting.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com</link>
	<description>informing digital discovery decisions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:27:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on E-Discovery: Two Key Decisions by mreichenbach</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/2036/comment-page-1#comment-3371</link>
		<dc:creator>mreichenbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/2036#comment-3371</guid>
		<description>Hi George.

I really like the job that Bobby did here. Well thought out and a very informative piece.  Both cases are so interesting and both will be cited on many briefs, pleadings and decisions, as time marches on.

Shamelessly, I&#039;ve blogged this story on On The Mark. 

I wanted to give In Re Discovery some link-love for the post, too.

I try to visit In Re Discovery once a day.  

Best

Mark R.
http://www.metalincs.com/onthemark/index.php/archives/28</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi George.</p>
<p>I really like the job that Bobby did here. Well thought out and a very informative piece.  Both cases are so interesting and both will be cited on many briefs, pleadings and decisions, as time marches on.</p>
<p>Shamelessly, I&#8217;ve blogged this story on On The Mark. </p>
<p>I wanted to give In Re Discovery some link-love for the post, too.</p>
<p>I try to visit In Re Discovery once a day.  </p>
<p>Best</p>
<p>Mark R.<br />
<a href="http://www.metalincs.com/onthemark/index.php/archives/28" rel="nofollow">http://www.metalincs.com/onthemark/index.php/archives/28</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Discovery Savings: Going Native by netbui</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/1452/comment-page-1#comment-3370</link>
		<dc:creator>netbui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 19:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/1452#comment-3370</guid>
		<description>I have a rebuttal to this article at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jerrybui.com/edd/2007/05/beware-of-going-native.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jerrybui.com/edd/2007/05/beware-of-going-native.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a rebuttal to this article at: <a href="http://www.jerrybui.com/edd/2007/05/beware-of-going-native.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jerrybui.com/edd/2007/05/beware-of-going-native.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deloitte Financial Advisory Services Online Poll Shows That Organizations Believe More Training Needed in Records Retention Policies and Procedures in Wake of Amendment to Electronic Data Discovery Rules by Rick Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/282/comment-page-1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/282#comment-15</guid>
		<description>The results of this ad hoc poll come as no surprise, and every survey conducted shows similar results.  Litigation readiness is an empty concept without effective records management policies and preservation management procedures.  Organizations must address the compliance side of e-discovery.  Due diligence, policy development, and training and awareness,  in a modest sized company can take as long as six months, which means the exposure will get worse before it improves for organizations following the effective date of the new federal rules of civil procedure on December 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results of this ad hoc poll come as no surprise, and every survey conducted shows similar results.  Litigation readiness is an empty concept without effective records management policies and preservation management procedures.  Organizations must address the compliance side of e-discovery.  Due diligence, policy development, and training and awareness,  in a modest sized company can take as long as six months, which means the exposure will get worse before it improves for organizations following the effective date of the new federal rules of civil procedure on December 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electronic Communications Retention, Retrieval &amp; Supervision by yclipse</title>
		<link>http://www.sochaconsulting.com/archives/117/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>yclipse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sochaconsulting.com/inrediscovery/archives/117#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Did you recognize the name? 

See the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_riel&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia entry&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you recognize the name? </p>
<p>See the <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_riel" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia entry</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
